Evaluation of the "Story-Gami Applications: Let's Fold Learning in Two with Fun" Program in the Framework of Participant Opinions

31 July, 2023

 

Authors: Ferat YILMAZ, Mustafa Remzi YARDIMCI

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this study is to evaluate the activity "Story-Gami Applications: Let's Fold Learning in Two with Fun" according to the opinions of pre-service primary school teachers.

Design/methodology/approach – The present study was conducted in a fully mixed simultaneous equal-status design. Thirty pre-service teachers from seven geographical regions of Turkey participated in the study. The research data were collected with the "Program Evaluation Participant Form" prepared by the researcher. Quantitative data obtained from the evaluation form were analyzed at item level with descriptive statistics such as percentage, frequency and mean. The data obtained from open-ended questions were analyzed by content analysis used in qualitative research.

Findings – According to the opinions of the participants, "Story-Gami Applications: Let's Fold Learning in Two with Fun" activity contributed to pre-service primary school teachers at a high level in cognitive, affective and psycho-motor dimensions. Participants think that story-gami can be used in value teaching, Turkish teaching, mathematics teaching, science teaching and life science teaching. The participants stated that story-gami can have positive effects on students such as attracting attention, having fun, muscle development, communication, creative thinking, reflective thinking, problem solving, permanent learning, establishing a relationship between courses, academic success, development of speaking skills, curiosity, talent discovery. Participants believe that story-gami can be used within the existing educational opportunities, especially in terms of cost, time, physical facilities, audience diversity, etc. Participants stated that the program surprised them, opened their horizons and socialized them.

Originality/value – This study includes the evaluation of a first scientific event organized for the first time in Turkey on how prospective primary school teachers will use story-gami practices in their professional lives.

Keywords: origami, story-gami, TÜBİTAK 2237-A

To download the article[Full Text]

References

Andreass, B. (2011). Origami art as a means of facilitating learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 32-36.

Avcu, S., & Avcu, R. (2019). Ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının origami dersinde edindikleri deneyimler. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (50), 136-166.

Boakes, N. (2008). Origami-mathematics lessons: Paper folding as a teaching tool. Mathidues, 1(1), 1-9.

Boz, B. (2015). İki boyutlu kâğıtlardan üç boyutlu origami küpüne yolculuk. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 5(1), 20-33.

Chia, C. M. M., & Sujan, D. (2009). Origami and its applications in automotive field. 2nd CUTSE International Conference. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/19661/134018_16471_ESF_35.pdf?sequence=2

Cipoletti, B., & Wilson, N. (2004). Turning origami into the language of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(1), 26-31.

Çaylan, B., Masal, M., Masal, E., Takunyacı, M., & Ergene, Ö. (2017). Origami ile matematik dersi süresince ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının van hiele geometrik düşünme düzeyleri ile origami inançları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 1(1), 24-35.

Davis, J., Leslie, R., Billington, S., & Slater, P. R. (2010). Origami: a versatile modeling system for visualising chemical structure and exploring molecular function. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1), 43-47.

Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194-197. doi:10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4

Duatepe-Paksu, A. & Boz-Yaman, B. (2018). Origami çalışmalarının öğretmen adaylarının uzamsal yeteneklerine ve origaminin matematik dersinde kullanımına yönelik inançlarına etkisi. Cemil Meriç – 10. Sosyal Bilimler ve Spor Kongresi. Hatay – 23-25 Kasım 2018.

Fei, L. J., & Sujan, D. (2013). Origami theory and its applications: a literature review. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 73, 1131-1135.

Güneş, M. H. (2012). Origami technique in the teaching of nucleic acids. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(43), 222-233.

Hoon, E. M. (2015). Students want interactive reading activities. 2015 International Conference on School Librarianship of Asian Countries. 15-16 October, Taipei, Taiwan.

Iyer, S., Katz, R. (2010) Origami: an interdisciplinary approach using story-gami. Paper presented to the Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education (5OSME), Singapore

İnce, B., Mertol, H., & Kaya, N. G. (2021). Origaminin tarihi gelişimi ve yararları. Proceedings book, 3, 5. XI. UMTEB INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON VOCATIONAL & TECHNICAL SCIENCES. September 3-5, 2021. 49-55.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Eğitim Araştırmaları: Nicel, nitel ve karma yaklaşımlar (S. B. Demir, Çev.). Ankara: Eğiten.

Karadeniz, M. H. (2020). Origami tabanlı öğretim uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarına katkıları ve karşılaşılan zorluklar: üçgen ve dörtgenler. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(24), 2584-2614.

Kemankaşlı, N. (2018). Meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin origami etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararasi Necatibey Eğitim ve Sosyal Bilimler Araştirmalari Kongresi(Unesak 2018) . Bildiri Tam Metin Kitabi Proceeding Book, 417-430. 26-28 Ekim 2018, Balikesir Türkiye.

Krisztián, Á., Bernáth, L., Gombos, H., & Vereczkei, L. (2015). Developing numerical ability in children with mathematical difficulties using origami. Perceptual and motor skills, 121(1), 233-243.

Leech, N.L., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant, 43, 265-275.

Mastin, M. (2007). Storytelling+ origami= story-gami mathematics. Teaching children mathematics, 14(4), 206-212.

Meyer, D., & Meyer, J. (1999, July). Teaching mathematical thinking through origami. In Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science, 191-204.

Oguz, A. (2016). An ınstructional method suggestion: conveying stories through origami (story-gami). Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(8), 9-22.

Öz Çelikbaş, E. Ö. (2019). Dışavurumcu sanat terapisinde resim terapisi alternatif uygulamaları: origami kirigami ve kat-ı sanatı örnekleri. Çeşm-i Cihan: Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi E-Dergisi, 6(2), 48-60.

Polat, S. (2013). Origami ile matematik öğretimi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(21), 15-27.

Santagello, C. D. (2020). Theory and practice of origami in science. Soft Matter, 16(1), 94-01.

Sze, S. (2005). Math and mind mapping: Origami construction. Dunleavy: Niagara University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED490352). http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED490350.pdf

Tuğrul, B., & Kavici, M. (2002). Kağit katlama sanati origami ve öğrenme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(11), 1-17.

Ünan, Z., Aksan, Z., & Çelikler, D. (2016). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının canlılar konusuna yönelik origami ile modellemeleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(Özel sayı), 165-174.

Ünan, Z., Aksan, Z., & Çelikler, D. (2017). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının origami konusundaki farkındalıkları. International Ejer Congress Bildiri Kitabı. 62-66.

Yuzawa, M., Bart, W. M., Kinne, L. J., Sukemune, S., & Kataoka, M. (1999). The effect of “origami” practice on size comparison strategy among young Japanese and American children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(2), 133-143.

Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Kneschke, A., Radler, S., Gausmann, M., Duttine, C., & Haider, H. (2020). Origami folding: Taxing resources necessary for the acquisition of sequential skills. PloS one, 15(10), e0240226

Cite

Yılmaz, F. & Yardimci, M. R. (2023). Evaluation of the "Story-Gami Applications: Let's Fold Learning in Two with Fun" Program in the Framework of Participant Opinions. Turkish Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 1-16.